+1 for Abandoned or Archived.
Won't Fix implies that some one has actually looked at it.
-Chris
Sent from my iPhone
On 26/11/2014, at 9:05 AM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote:
> We did this bug clean up before so this isn't new to me. However, I do
> wonder if the resolution "Won't Fix" rubs people the wrong way? Maybe if we
> had an "Abandoned" resolution that would sit better. Aside from reading the
> comments in the ticket, it's not possible to know what was closed truly
> because something is intended never to be fixed and what was closed due to
> age.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Paul
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> One postive response from MECLIPSE-196: Perfectly happy this was closed,
>> happy we're not using EARs any more. Can't wait to see new things coming
>> from takari.
>>
>> Am 2014-11-25 um 22:22 schrieb Jason van Zyl:
>>
>>> I don't agree. This is a project, not a product and if no one looks at
>>> something for 2 years then no one cares. We are not erasing the issues and
>>> if someone does care enough to ask to reopen an issue then that's great.
>>> But I've tried to purge down the list to something manageable twice now and
>>> it keeps growing so I highly appreciate what Michael is doing because it's
>>> unmanageable right now. And now that he's done that I have some motivation
>>> again to look through the issues so kudos to Michael. Nothing stops anyone
>>> from going through and reopening something, I don't think we need group
>>> scrubbing sessions. I think core committers need to go through and help
>>> curate the issues on a more regular basis.
>>>
>>> On Nov 25, 2014, at 4:03 PM, Dennis Lundberg <denn...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Michael
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunatelly, I think that 2 years of inactivity is way to short time.
>>>> I
>>>> wish it wasn't so, but the reality is that the age of an issue is not a
>>>> good indicator of whether the issue is valid or not.
>>>>
>>>> I think a better approach is to have joint bug scrub sessions, where we
>>>> join forces to manually check the validity of the issues.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dennis Lundberg
>>>> Den 24 nov 2014 23:05 skrev "Michael Osipov" <micha...@apache.org>:
>>>>
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>
>>>>> I ran this query in JIRA: project in projectsWhereUserHasPermission
>>>>> ("Administer
>>>>> Projects") AND updated <= "2012-12-31" and resolution = Unresolved and
>>>>> type
>>>>> = Bug ORDER BY created desc
>>>>>
>>>>> Bugs which haven't been touched for almost two years. Total amount:
>>>>> *1139*. A lot of them are still Maven 1.x related 8-).
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there someone with bulk change abilities able to close those as
>>>>> "Won't
>>>>> Fix" with a note like: Big clean up end of 2014, you think that this
>>>>> issue
>>>>> still persists, reopen it?
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>
>>>>> Michael
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>> Jason van Zyl
>>> Founder, Apache Maven
>>> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
>>> http://twitter.com/takari_io
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> the course of true love never did run smooth ...
>>>
>>> -- Shakespeare
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
