I am not sure I understand your concerns. Consider the following simple
source tree with a parent and single child project
some:parent:1.2.3
some:module parent=some:parent:[1.0,2.0)
Before this change Maven simply ignored local some:parent:1.2.3 when
building the module and always attempted to resolve
some:parent:[1.0,2.0) from repositories. With this change Maven resolves
some:parent:[1.0,2.0) from the source tree as expected.
Or did I misunderstand the problem?
--
Regards,
Igor
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015, at 08:11 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> At first blush this change seems like a bad idea to me. I consider the
> reactor/multi-module project an atomic unit and this change runs counter
> to that. Why do you want a parent installed instead of everything working
> cohesively within the reactor?
>
> Are you trying to build part of the tree for some reason and cannot build
> it all together? Or are you stepping into a module and trying to build it
> by itself? I understand that there are limitations and there needs to be
> a way to build within the context of a reactor regardless of where you
> are but I’m not sure I want us to have to support this feature forever.
>
> Can you provide a little more background please.
>
> > On Jul 23, 2015, at 2:06 PM, Stephen Connolly
> > <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > It's not completely ugly, but it does entangle dependencies further which I
> > view as ugly.
> >
> > There is an existing todo above this code to move the validation to a
> > different module, so I believe this will all get removed at that time
> >
> > On Thursday, July 23, 2015, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> If this change is so ugly, why are there no comments explaining the ugly?
> >> On Jul 23, 2015 10:48 AM, "jvanzyl" <g...@git.apache.org <javascript:;>>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Github user jvanzyl commented on the pull request:
> >>>
> >>> https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/60#issuecomment-124129817
> >>>
> >>> I'm out in the middle of nowhere, but i'll cancel the vote, test and
> >>> re-roll once I'm back to civilization.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>> If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
> >> your
> >>> reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
> >> feature
> >>> enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working,
> >> please
> >>> contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org <javascript:;> or
> >> file a JIRA ticket
> >>> with INFRA.
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org <javascript:;>
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >> <javascript:;>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from my phone
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Jason van Zyl
> Founder, Takari and Apache Maven
> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
> http://twitter.com/takari_io
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> happiness is like a butterfly: the more you chase it, the more it will
> elude you, but if you turn your attention to other things, it will come
> and sit softly on your shoulder ...
>
> -- Thoreau
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
