Neither nor. Many use OpenJDK in production even w/o any commercial plans because they are happy with that. So there is also C.
On 2023/06/01 10:48:28 Tamás Cservenák wrote: > This is silly. > So we need to support Java 8 in the future (not yet happened) Maven 4 > releases due: > > A) hobbyist (personal/individual users or for non-production, > development/testing purposes) > > OR > > B) commercial entities paying for licenses (commercial/business use of > those public releases in production is restricted and requires a commercial > license) > > Which one, A or B? > > For me, cas A hobbyists will happily use the latest Java LTS. And in case B > support DID end in a sense Guillaume meant it. > > Thanks > T > > On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 12:39 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold <elh...@ibiblio.org> > wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 6:28 AM Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > JDK 8 active support ended 15 months ago, so I think that's definitely > > fine > > > to require a newer version. > > > > This is a common misconception. JDK 8 is fully supported by multiple > > companies including Azul. It also seems supported by Oracle: > > > > "For Java SE 8, Oracle will continue to release new updates on its > > public websites for personal/individual users or for non-production, > > development/testing purposes. However, commercial/business use of > > those public releases in production is restricted and requires a > > commercial license." > > > > -- > > Elliotte Rusty Harold > > elh...@ibiblio.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
