On 1/21/07, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
The MINA ByteBuffer classes can be used without MINA for easier manipulation
of NIO ByteBuffers. For now, they belong to mina-core JAR, but we could
split it even further to the two JARs; mina-bytebuffer, mina-core, and
mina-transport-nio. By this sepration, we could remove some bad cyclic
dependencies between transport implementation and the core API and allow
users enjoy the access to the powerful byte buffer manipulation without
using MINA.
WDYT?
-1
I dont think mina should be split even further. Maybe they could be
seperated for external use but Mina core should contain them too.
