+1

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Scott O'Bryan <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Yeah,  that looks good Mike.  Thanks for fixing my fix..  ;)  Maybe with
> any luck those repositories will stabilize and not be moved around so much..
>
> +1
>
> Scott
>
>
> On 06/25/2010 10:51 AM, Michael Freedman wrote:
>
> FYI ... we have patched up the project's root pom to reference the errant
> respository and rebuilt the artifacts which replaced the old one's at:
> http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge/>
>
> I have verified an empty repository builds as well as verified that the
> generated libs continue to pass the TCK and the examples run (properly).
>
> But please do double check my work.
>
> Unless I hear otherwise I intend to close the vote Tuesday and publish/not
> publish based on the vote.
>     -Mike-
>
>
> On 6/25/2010 9:15 AM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
>
> +1
>
> 2010/6/23 Scott O'Bryan <[email protected]>
>
>> Yeah, I think I ran into this issue a while back and noticed that they
>> only had one version of JSF 1.2 in the Maven 2 repo and I had to use
>> the legacy repository.  Let me research it to make sure my memory
>> isn't flawed.  I hate when people change repositories.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Jun 23, 2010, at 6:31 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks Scott!
>> >
>> > Not 100% sure, but I think they have been in the maven2 repo already in
>> the past. Did they get ditched somewhen? I also remember that there was a
>> mvn2 repo but I had to used the <legacy> repo format a few years ago.
>> >
>> > LieGrue,
>> > strub
>> >
>> > --- On Wed, 6/23/10, Scott O'Bryan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> From: Scott O'Bryan <[email protected]>
>> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 1.0.0
>> >> To: "MyFaces Development" <[email protected]>
>> >> Date: Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 12:26 PM
>> >> Yeah, I think I might know what this
>> >> issue is...  Thanks for finding
>> >> it.  It looks like some versions of JSF only exist in
>> >> the Maven 1
>> >> repositories.  Let me see if I can take a quick stab
>> >> at a patch and
>> >> I'll have Mike regenerate the artifacts.
>> >>
>> >> Sent from my iPhone
>> >>
>> >> On Jun 23, 2010, at 1:32 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi Mike!
>> >>>
>> >>> Sorry for this maybe noobish question (have no clue
>> >> about portlets), but I was not able to build it due to a
>> >>> missing javax.faces:jsf-api:jar:1.2_03
>> >>>
>> >>> I thought it should be up here:
>> >>> http://download.java.net/maven/2/javax/faces/jsf-api/
>> >>> but apparently it isn't.
>> >>>
>> >>> Can you please try and move your ~/.m2/repository to a
>> >> templocation and rebuild all over again? Maybe you should
>> >> switch to myfaces-api, or is javax.faces required for the
>> >> RI?
>> >>>
>> >>> txs and LieGrue,
>> >>> strub
>> >>>
>> >>> --- On Tue, 6/22/10, Michael Freedman <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> From: Michael Freedman <[email protected]>
>> >>>> Subject: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge
>> >> 1.0.0
>> >>>> To: [email protected]
>> >>>> Date: Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 10:39 PM
>> >>>> Please vote on the proposed release
>> >>>> of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 1.0.0.  This is the
>> >> first
>> >>>> (final) production version of the JSR 301 RI:
>> >> Portlet 1.0
>> >>>> Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2.  It
>> >> corresponds to and
>> >>>> is intended to be released (roughly) coincident
>> >> with the JCP
>> >>>> approval of this JSRs final approval ballot which
>> >> is
>> >>>> currently underway.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The signed release bridge artifacts pass the TCK
>> >> (i.e. all
>> >>>> its tests) and can be inspected at
>> http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge/>
>> >>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge/>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the
>> >> bits
>> >>>> [ ] +0
>> >>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these
>> >> bits not to
>> >>>> be released,
>> >>>>       and why..............
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>     -Mike-
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>


-- 
Grant Smith - V.P. Information Technology
Marathon Computer Systems, LLC.

Reply via email to