+1
On 6/25/2010 9:51 AM, Michael Freedman wrote:
FYI ... we have patched up the project's root pom to reference the
errant respository and rebuilt the artifacts which replaced the old
one's at:
http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge/
<http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge/>
I have verified an empty repository builds as well as verified that
the generated libs continue to pass the TCK and the examples run
(properly).
But please do double check my work.
Unless I hear otherwise I intend to close the vote Tuesday and
publish/not publish based on the vote.
-Mike-
On 6/25/2010 9:15 AM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
+1
2010/6/23 Scott O'Bryan <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
Yeah, I think I ran into this issue a while back and noticed that
they
only had one version of JSF 1.2 in the Maven 2 repo and I had to use
the legacy repository. Let me research it to make sure my memory
isn't flawed. I hate when people change repositories.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 23, 2010, at 6:31 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Thanks Scott!
>
> Not 100% sure, but I think they have been in the maven2 repo
already in the past. Did they get ditched somewhen? I also
remember that there was a mvn2 repo but I had to used the
<legacy> repo format a few years ago.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- On Wed, 6/23/10, Scott O'Bryan <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>> From: Scott O'Bryan <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 1.0.0
>> To: "MyFaces Development" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Date: Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 12:26 PM
>> Yeah, I think I might know what this
>> issue is... Thanks for finding
>> it. It looks like some versions of JSF only exist in
>> the Maven 1
>> repositories. Let me see if I can take a quick stab
>> at a patch and
>> I'll have Mike regenerate the artifacts.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Jun 23, 2010, at 1:32 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Mike!
>>>
>>> Sorry for this maybe noobish question (have no clue
>> about portlets), but I was not able to build it due to a
>>> missing javax.faces:jsf-api:jar:1.2_03
>>>
>>> I thought it should be up here:
>>> http://download.java.net/maven/2/javax/faces/jsf-api/
>>> but apparently it isn't.
>>>
>>> Can you please try and move your ~/.m2/repository to a
>> templocation and rebuild all over again? Maybe you should
>> switch to myfaces-api, or is javax.faces required for the
>> RI?
>>>
>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>> --- On Tue, 6/22/10, Michael Freedman
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: Michael Freedman <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge
>> 1.0.0
>>>> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 10:39 PM
>>>> Please vote on the proposed release
>>>> of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 1.0.0. This is the
>> first
>>>> (final) production version of the JSR 301 RI:
>> Portlet 1.0
>>>> Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2. It
>> corresponds to and
>>>> is intended to be released (roughly) coincident
>> with the JCP
>>>> approval of this JSRs final approval ballot which
>> is
>>>> currently underway.
>>>>
>>>> The signed release bridge artifacts pass the TCK
>> (i.e. all
>>>> its tests) and can be inspected at
http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge/
<http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge/>
>>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge/>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the
>> bits
>>>> [ ] +0
>>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these
>> bits not to
>>>> be released,
>>>> and why..............
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -Mike-
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
