On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote: > -1 >
I've reverted that commit. Getting this wrong could have serious repercussions, so let's make sure we get it right. -Rob > Could we please take this to legal-discuss, or to Trademarks@? I know > you think you are protecting the OpenOffice.org trademark. So your > intentions are good. But I'm pretty sure that you are actually > risking the trademark by applying it to the website when the trademark > registration is explicitly for software, not for a website. > > So let's revert that until we get further clarification. You don't > want to mess around with trademark fraud. > > Thanks. > > -Rob > > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: >> The next shed to bike ;-) >> >> On Feb 1, 2013, at 3:21 PM, w...@apache.org wrote: >> >>> Author: wave >>> Date: Fri Feb 1 23:21:23 2013 >>> New Revision: 1441659 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1441659&view=rev >>> Log: >>> No clear link back to www.openoffice.org >>> >>> Modified: >>> openoffice/site/trunk/templates/sidenav.mdtext >>> >>> Modified: openoffice/site/trunk/templates/sidenav.mdtext >>> URL: >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/site/trunk/templates/sidenav.mdtext?rev=1441659&r1=1441658&r2=1441659&view=diff >>> ============================================================================== >>> --- openoffice/site/trunk/templates/sidenav.mdtext (original) >>> +++ openoffice/site/trunk/templates/sidenav.mdtext Fri Feb 1 23:21:23 2013 >>> @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ >>> - [License](/license.html) >>> - [Trademarks](/trademarks.html) >>> - [Press](/press.html) >>> + - [OpenOffice.org®](http://www.openoffice.org/) >>> + >>> # Community >>> >>> - [Get Involved](/get-involved.html) >>> >>> >>
