Am 07.02.2013 22:10, schrieb Pavel Janík: >> In my opinion the problem is not only the problem with the trade mark (or >> the simple program-name) but also a public relations problem. >> I do not know the team of Feodora, but I know many people of LO / TDF and, >> let me be clear, _some_ (_not_ all) consider it well to cultivate a public >> representation that users subliminally says that LO's successor OOo is . >> (not as an official statement, but subliminally) > > Is it LO who is infringing on our trademark or is it Fedora who is misusing > our trademark for other project? Shouldn't we notify Fedora people politely > about this situation and let them (and help them!) solve the issue first?
It's not only Fedora, but also other GNU/Linux distributions using such transitional packages. It's a common way supporting users to update their system. Regards Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
