On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:45:41PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > >If dictionaries were ALv2, for sure AOO would include them, as > >Sun/Oracle did (this was something the native-lang asked for long time). > >So this is something we use with dictionaries just because we cannot > >include them by default. > > In the case of dictionaries (which is anyway marginal with respect > to the current discussion) I actually find that what OpenOffice is > doing now, i.e., bundling them as extensions, is a good solution.
I was talking about *how* they are packaged in the basis core-01 package. Before, they were packaged as single packages. You can find the remaining of this under trunk/main/setup_native/source/packinfo/packinfo_office.txt All the gid_Module_Root_Extension_Dictionary_<LANG> are package descriptions for extension dictionaries, see http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/ooo/trunk/main/setup_native/source/packinfo/packinfo_office.txt?revision=1300105&view=markup#l515 If you are still planning to package for Fedora, you will have to workaround this (extensions should be in its own package) and the problem of the duplication when the extensions is copied in the user installation (Fedora used a patched version of unopkg that added the link option). Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina
pgp55qO9HsVNI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
