Kay Schenk wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:26 AM, janI <j...@apache.org> wrote:

On 13 August 2013 15:14, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote:

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:24 AM, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi,

first if all I volunteer to act as the release manager for AOO 4.0.1 if
that is wanted but I am also open to let somebody else to the job ;-)


It is probably best if you continue, since 4.0.1 is very closely
related to 4.0.0, and you already have the build environment set up,
etc.

+1


In preparation for an AOO 4.0.1 release I have first created a AOO400
tag based on revision 1503704. I have also created a new branch AOO401
based on branch AOO400 based on the head revision of the branch.

I noticed that Yuri checked in some code on the branch already. Can we
please follow some guideline how we handle such release branches?

I would like to propose the following:

Changes on a release branch should be discussed before and should be in
relation to a proposed and approved fix (if you want showstopper) that
will go in the next release.


For now that means the branch AOO400 is dead and changes towards AOO
4.0.1 have to be made on the new branch AOO401 and should be discussed
first. Or propose the related issue as showstopper first.

I believe we agreed more or less to keep the changes for AOO 4.0.1
minimal to reduce the test effort. We should concentrate on the most
serious issues only and on new languages or improved translations. Keep
in mind that AOO 4.1 is coming as well. Stability is a key feature and
every single bug fix can introduce a regression as well. Often not
obvious directly.


I assume we also want to avoid introducing new UI strings?   Otherwise
we'd require translation updates on all languages.


I would formulate it stronger: we cannot allow new strings, unless it is
absolutely unavoidable.




Any opinions or comment son this plan.


Should we create new Release Notes?  Or augment the existing 4.0.0
ones?   It might be simpler if 4.0.x releases share the same release
notes, but we start with fresh ones for 4.1?


Lets share release notes, amend so that is clear what is only available in
4.0.1, and start from a fresh with 4.1


For 3.4.1, which was basically an update release with addtional languages,
the release notes were sort of like an addendum to 3.4.0 --


https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4.1+Release+Notes

I think Release Notes for 4.0.1 should be similar but, yes, we need a new
page for them.


I agree, the release notes for 4.0.1 should have there own page documenting the changes for that release only with a link to the full 4.0.0 notes.

Regards
Keith

I also assume that 4.0.1 will simply overwrite 4.0 exe on mirrors etc.

rgds
jan I.



-Rob

Juergen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org








---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to