On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: > Rob Weir wrote: >> >> Thread for discussion > > > Come on, what's this? Do you guys read this list? We had this conversation > earlier this month, not ages ago. It ended like this: > > http://markmail.org/message/2ae5vrtevxyizaje >
Unfortunately we have a party who wants to steamroll through a fast delete unless I immediately show "proof" of consensus for another option. From what I've been able to ascertain a vote is the only acceptable proof. Personally, I'd be happy to look at your eventual version. I think many others would as well. The vote does not really change that. Regards, -Rob > [Andrea] The page provides relevant information in a bad way. It is by > keeping it as it is that we play the game of haters. I'll propose a rewrite > next weekend. > > Now, weekends do not last 5 days, unfortunately, and life on the OpenOffice > lists has been more eventful than I expected. But I very much prefer that > instead of flooding the list as a handful of people did in the last few > hours, someone would remember this and either say that we were still waiting > for my rewrite or that they were replacing me in the task since I'm clearly > late. But voting on the abstract option of replacing the page which > something that doesn't exist does not really make a lot of sense to me. > > And it sounds too much like the usual "we talk about something expecting > that someone else does the work" that I'd like we abandon. > > Well, my offer to rewrite it remains valid... but you'll have to be patient > until next weekend! > > Regards, > Andrea. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
