> On 16 Sep 15, at 13:56, Rob Weir <r...@robweir.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:52 PM, John D'Orazio > <john.dora...@cappellaniauniroma3.org> wrote: >> Interestingly mr. David Gerard IS a moderator on Wikipedia it seems. He >> still has to abide by the rules though. And there is quite a bit of >> discussion on the talk page, where some users have opted to split the >> "Apache OpenOffice" project onto its own page as a completely separate >> derivative project. All that is needed is to chime in on the article talk >> page citing references to legal info about OpenOffice.org being officially >> in the hands of the Apache Software Foundation. If there is evidence of >> that (which seems obvious to me, I'm a newcomer but I go to the webpage and >> I see Apache OpenOffice on the OpenOffice.org webpage), it just needs to be >> cited on the talk page to back any kind of edits to the article that >> reflect that. Seems that the article has already been split and "Apache >> OpenOffice" has it's own wikipedia article ( >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_OpenOffice), I wouldn't make a big >> deal about having a separate article but I would oppose the POV opinions >> about Apache not having legal rights to the OpenOffice.org project (hence >> the corrections to the infobox information). >> I don't know all of the technicalities, so the edits I just made might not >> be precise, for example which release was the first release to have the >> Apache license? >> > > Is this the same David Gerard discussed here? > > https://encyclopediadramatica.se/David_Gerard >
Oh, I hope so! Louis --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
