> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 09:55
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Release Manager for 4.2.0?
> 
> [getting back to this .. see below]
> 
> On 03/27/2016 01:13 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> > On 29/01/2016 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> >> For 4.2.0 we need a Release Manager. I would prefer NOT to be the
> >> Release Manager for 4.2.0 since I'm finding that in this period I can
> >> help more productively with tasks that do not require constant
> >> interaction ...
> >> I am surely available to have a significant role in the 4.2.0 release
> >
> > A few days after writing this, almost 2 months ago, sudden events left
> > me incapacitated to make any significant contributions until very
> > recently. I'm still unable to make long-term commitments.
> >
> > Anyway, there are some issues we need to get done as a team before
> > appointing a release manager makes sense:
> >
> > 1) Enough code. Done. The merge of the recent gbuild work totally
> > justifies a 4.2.0 release. Also, in 4.1.2 we only included a tiny
> > fraction of the fixes that (at that time) were available on trunk. So
> > here we are already OK, and we've been OK for months.
[orcmid] 

I am unclear about the state of the gbuild merge.  Was it done even though 
there are unresolved problems using it for building Windows binaries?

[ ... ]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to