+1
I have a question thought. In Tour of C++ (Bjarn Stroustrup) its
recommended to use array instead of buildin arrays and only to use
Arrays if we know the amount of elements (constexpr).
buildin arrays example: Circle myarray[10]
array example: array<Circle,10> myarray
so std::array::at is equal to the arrayexample?
sorry if the question is dumb. I am not sure if what I know is the same
what you talk about.
I am in the "early carrier" category. lol.
All the best
Peter
Am 17.06.2017 um 19:52 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
Without going into details here, some recently fixed security issues
have related to the use of fixed size arrays without bounds checks.
In general, that is not a very robust programming practice. It depends
on careful checking in the source code to prevent array overflow.
I suggest a project to replace raw arrays with Standard Template Library
classes as appropriate. All accesses should be through safe functions
such as std::array::at. In some cases we could replace a limited size
but large array with e.g. a std::vector that can start small and grow
only as needed.
This matches nicely with my observations of volunteers. We are not
getting many people with the skills and experience to dive into a
very large body of code and debug it. We are getting students and
early career programmers who could work on something like this. It
might also be a viable Google Summer of Code project.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
