Laurent Godard wrote: > Hi Mathias > >> When the release candidates where delivered a new cvs branch was created >> for them (starting with a new numbering for the corresponding master >> builds, so we got m1,m2 etc.) while new development for the next release >> continued with the "old" numbering (m146, m147 etc.). We did the same >> when releasing 2.0 BTW. >> >> I agree that it would be better to show the full version number in the >> dialog directly. The current way seems to create a lot of irritations. > > yes it is a real pain when you're on users lists to identify the version > they're speaking about > > i would suggest > > 1- put all the revision number in the OOo Name > 2.0.1 instead of 2.0, everywhere, not only in the help
That would be my choice also. > 2- when you create a sub cvs branch for a RC > call it so that it contains the milestone it is based on > eg m146-1, m146-2, m146-3 aso Here I disagree. The version shound contain only the regular version number, but why not showing the build version directly in the "About dialog" below the version (instead of asking for "CTRL-SDT to display it")? Best regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer - OpenOffice.org Application Framework Project Lead Please reply to the list only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a spam sink. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
