>From: "Craig McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On 3/30/07, Gary VanMatre wrote: > > >From: "Matthias Wessendorf" > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > are you guys OK w/ changing the dependency for Spring-XXX to 2.0.x, > > > instead of 1.2.x ? > > > My current app depends hardly on Spring 2.0.x and the Shale-Spring-JAR > > > causes "fun" b/c of that. > > > > > > Only for the 1.10-Snap (trunk) stuff. > > > > > > > > > I would think that the 1.10 snapshot would be OK. > > I am fine with that (presuming that it works, of course, but that > shouldn't be an issue AFAICT). > > > I'd also like to move the 1.10 snapshot to Java 1.5 and specifically target > JSF 1.2. > > > > That's a bit more aggressive :-), but is also something we should talk > about more. Besides the ability to use annotations, this would also > let us review our APIs and use generics where they make sense. >
Yeah, I'm in love with the new generics. In terms of Clay, I really think we need to pick a JSF version. We are not going to be able to support the new EL method bindings in 1.2 until we make a commitment. I'd also like to see clay annotations in addition to XML and HTML configs. I'm not sure what the best timing for this will be. I know that I'm going to be busy learning .Net for the next few months so I'm not pushing for a decision..... > Craig > > Gary > > > > > > > > > -m > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh > > > > > > further stuff: > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
