myfaces is already pretty large, so if you feel, that Shale should stay a TLP, I have no problems with that.
I just came back to this idea, b/c was discussed in the past, nothing happened, and Shale is pretty ... quite, these days. -M On Dec 6, 2007 5:13 PM, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Hi, > > > > as discussed already (here/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) there will be a move of > > Shale (or some parts of it), > > into MyFaces. > > > > But, before a thing like that will happen, we should release > > 1.0.5 > > 1.1.0 > > > > I'd like to see another release. I know there are several outstanding bugs > logged that need addressed. I hammered down a few several months ago but > have not made the time to dig in again. I saw that Rahul did some work last > week too. > > I think another release would be important on both branches. If we decide to > merge with myfaces and don't take all of the existing modules, I'm not sure > what that will do to people have investments in shale. For example, Ryan > Wynn has shared that they have developed a very large portal (man years of > development) using Clay. That's just one example and I'm sure there are > others that have taken advantage of other parts of shale. > > For this reason, I'm rethinking the "cafeteria" proposal. I plan to be more > active in the future. IMO, Shale is a lost leader now. Maybe Shale should > consider pulling in more volunteers. That seems to be a secret to Struts > success over the years. That leads to the next question, would they all be > myfaces commiter anyway and would it just make sense to join communities. > > > Gary > > > > > WDYT? > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > further stuff: > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
