just taking a stab here , would it be impossible to have an API that is agnostic of VLT vs resource based?
regards antonio On Jul 24, 2013, at 7:54 PM, Robert Munteanu wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Justin Edelson > <jus...@justinedelson.com> wrote: >> +1 to tooling and moving Maven stuff there. >> -0 to moving IDE out of the whiteboard until we have a consensus on a >> serialization/transport form. >> >> My understanding is that the current IDE codebase is being used to >> prototype a serialization form and transport protocol and that we will >> eventually be trying to reach consensus on using that, vlt, or something >> else. > > I've waited to propose move out of whiteboard until we had a solid > module structure which can be used to evolve the IDE stuff into what > we want it to be. > > The serialization form is more or less a draft which I'm using until > FileVault is accepted into Jackrabbit. The transport protocol is based > on the Sling HTTP Get/Post servlets, which is a de facto standard for > Sling applications, at least for those not using FileVault. > > The point here is that I don't have vlt to work with _now_ and I can > evolve the Eclipse mechanisms ( UI , servers, modules, change > detection ) - which are not trivial - without waiting for vlt. And I > can gather feedback from people brave enough to try it without waiting > for vlt. > > Once we can use VLT, we'll see what fits best. I admit that I have an > inclination towards the resource-based API, but it's not my personal > decision to make. > > Of course, I can put a hold on moving the codebase to trunk/tooling, > but that would not gain anything for now, since the codebase is in > flux anyway. > > Instead, my suggestion is not to make any sort of releases, not even > technology previews, until we have consensus on the VLT vs > Resource-based implementation. > > WDYT? > > Robert > >> >> An alternative would be to create the tooling top-level directory and then >> put the IDE in a branch. >> >> Justin >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Robert Munteanu <rob...@lmn.ro> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz >>> <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Felix Meschberger <fmesc...@adobe.com> >>> wrote: >>>>> ...create a top level "tooling" (or so) folder and put the "ide" and >>> "maven" stuff in there ?... >>> >>> I've created [0] to track this move and will do that later on today - >>> lots of stuff to adjust in the poms under maven. >>> >>> Robert >>> >>> [0]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2978 >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sent from my (old) computer >>> > > > > -- > Sent from my (old) computer
