On Friday 08 January 2016 11:15:13 Chetan Mehrotra wrote: > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Daniel Klco <daniel.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If this is a "beta" piece of software I'm not sure we'd need the > > dependency > > yet. > > Looks like my use of version as 0.0.2 caused confusion. To clarify > this is not a "beta" piece of software. Current feature set done is > stable, tested and the api not going to change in incompatible way. > Its just that I plan to add some more features to this module before > considering it as 1.0. I just treat 1.0 as special but its just me! > > Reason for current release is to allow use of the API part in other > bundles and not hold that work. Further feature work would mostly > affect reporting side which would not affect the bundles which make > use of the API delivered so far > > If others think that we should call it v 1.0.0 for it to be included > in bundle/commons and launchpad then I can as well cut a new release > with 1.0 as version number?
Chetan, big +1 for doing it that way. We have other bundles with versions smaller 1.0 in Launchpad and I wish we would do it with other bundles also to allow developers to test new features, e.g. validation. Regards, O. > Chetan Mehrotra
