On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 10:02:04PM -0800, Dan Quinlan wrote: > Actually, bug 3998 has always been in the Future queue.
Really? <me checks> Hrm, indeed. I remember moving it to the 3.0.2 queue ... Maybe my browser blew up mid-process? It's been doing that lately, unfortunately. <me moves ticket to 3.0.3 queue> > I don't understand why you are voting against a release because of a > feature request, which not a bug at all, isn't in the right milestone, > and hasn't been reviewed by you or anyone else. It's moot at this point, and I meant to vote -0.5 and not -1 BTW. I wanted more of a "I'd rather not yet" versus "NFW". It was more of a shock of nothing at all for weeks about a release, then suddenly, the one night I'm not sitting online, a bunch of stuff happens and a release occurs. Anyway, as for reasoning -- I have been having conversations with the Habeas folks to get this code/support into 3.0.2. Per my last message I've already explained how since there wasn't any discussion for weeks now wrt a release, there wasn't extreme urgency in doing a code review. Had I known there was going to be a release tonight/this week/this month, I would have made an effort to free up enough time to do the review beforehand. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "lp1 on fire" - Linux kernel error message
pgpRCWCdO3PcA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
