http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4707
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-27 20:37 ------- On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 08:31:01PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > (tolower(m->raw[i+1]) == 'd') is the cannonical way to handle this sort of > thing. It is actually a little less efficient than the repeated test you > show, > but it is generally more readable. I haven't really looked at the code, and my C is fairly rusty, but is there a reason we couldn't just do something like "if (strncasecmp(m->raw+i, 'DATA', 4)==0)" or something? It seems like checking byte-for-byte isn't the right way to go. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
