could you guys vote?  I reckon, since it's part of an official release
plan, we need 3 committer +1's (mine plus two more).

--j.

Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes:
> Sounds like an alright schedule to me.  It'd be nice to get away with a 
> single RC, but I hope that we have enough people test it that we end up 
> doing a second one. :)
> 
> Daryl
> 
> 
> Justin Mason wrote:
> > ping -- anyone there?
> > 
> > --j.
> > 
> > Justin Mason writes:
> >> Happy new year! New year, time for a new major release since we missed
> >> one in 2006 ;)
> >>
> >> I think the 3.2.0 bugs list has most of the major ones off the list, and
> >> the remaining either (a) don't need to be done for 3.2.0 necessarily or
> >> (b) will probably be doable in the month or whatever between now and
> >> release, in parallel with rescoring (feel free to shout if this is not the
> >> case ;).
> >>
> >> I've created http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5270 to
> >> track the rescoring task.
> >>
> >> First step, I think, is to define a schedule.  How does this sound?
> >> (based approximately on what we did for 3.1.0: 
> >> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Release310Schedule )
> >>
> >>   - T + 0 days: announce a heads-up mail. clean up our corpora, get ready
> >>     for mass-checking, try out mass-check to spot any big memory leaks or
> >>     whatnot, fix remaining bugs that affect mass-checks (esp bug 5260!),
> >>     get people signed up, enable all rules in svn.
> >>
> >>   - T + 1 week, around a Thursday or so: start --bayes --net mass-checks;
> >>     move to C-T-R.
> >>
> >>   - T + 3 weeks, a Monday or so: hopefully finish mass-checks, bugs
> >>     allowing ;) (note that includes two weekends.)
> >>
> >>   - T + 3 weeks: perceptron runs, voting on new proposed scores, etc
> >>
> >>   - T + 4 weeks and a bit: hopefully ready to release
> >>
> >>
> >> Interesting URLs for what happened in the 3.1.0 rescoring:
> >>
> >>   http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Release310Schedule
> >>   http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RescoreMassCheck
> >>   http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RescoreDetails
> >>   http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4505
> >>
> >>
> >> Here are the remaining 3.2.0 bugs fwiw, apart from bug 5270 (rescoring):
> >>
> >> 21 bugs found.
> >> ID      Sev     Pri     Summary
> >> 5155    maj     P1      "make install" always attempts to write to 
> >> /usr/local/lib...
> >> 5146    nor     P1      remove rule description translations out of 
> >> SpamAssassin ...
> >> 5269    blo     P2      may need to have separate mirror sets for 
> >> differing versi...
> >> 5235    maj     P2      SPF_FAIL on SMTP-authenticated mail relay
> >> 4493    enh     P2      add pre-tokenize text munge to learner
> >> 4820    maj     P3      The code for creating a new userstate_dir is 
> >> severly broken
> >> 4653    min     P3      bayes_pg.sql syntax error for old versions of 
> >> PgSQL (7.4.x)
> >> 5260    maj     P5      Memory leak persists in 3.2 DNS usage
> >> 3563    nor     P5      Odd errors if tieing Bayes DB while learning...
> >> 4078    nor     P5      Windows Hebrew encoding in subject not detected
> >> 4332    nor     P5      PMS->{redirect_num} unused / obfu redirection not 
> >> included
> >> 4435    nor     P5      Progress meter doesn't handle time left when it's 
> >> in the ...
> >> 4598    nor     P5      If DNS set available and it's not, hard failure 
> >> occurs
> >> 4717    nor     P5      EnvelopeFrom option should be documented
> >> 4747    nor     P5      Problems with EnvelopeFrom auto-detection
> >> 4999    nor     P5      spamd --auth-ident trivial to bypass
> >> 5110    nor     P5      EXTRA_MPART_TYPE fires on valid multipart/related
> >> 5185    nor     P5      Bayesian learning uses different message checksums 
> >> during...
> >> 5257    nor     P5      push out autolearning thresholds for 3.2.0
> >> 4770    min     P5      use ASN data as Bayes token
> >>
> >> --j.
> >

Reply via email to