On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Liviu Nicoara <nikko...@hates.ms> wrote:
> In the light of your inability to answer the simplest questions about the > correctness and usefulness of this patch, I propose we strike the patch in > its entirety. Let me make something very clear to you: what I am doing here is a courtesy to the stdcxx project. There is no requirement in my job description to waste hours arguing with you in pointless squabbles over email. Nor is there a requirement in the APL V2.0 which would somehow compel us to redistribute our source code changes. > We could and should re-work the instances in the library where > we might use mutex and condition objects that are misaligned wrt the > mentioned kernel update. Yeah, why don't you go ahead and do that. Just like you fixed stdcxx-1056. --Stefan -- Stefan Teleman KDE e.V. stefan.tele...@gmail.com
