--- Steve Raeburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm posting this to the dev-list rather than carrying on with Bugzilla, > since it looks like there might be some further discussion :-) > > I have no position on whether this should be considered core or an > add-on, but if it's to be an add-on, why not bring it into Struts as a > new sub-project? It would be a good way to increase its visibilty and > acceptance while leaving it as an optional addition to the core Struts > product.
What criteria are we using when deciding what to add to the Struts project? The questions I asked in the bugzilla posting haven't been addressed. Why should the Struts team be expected to house and support extra add-on projects? We've been making good progress moving code out of Struts into the commons and focusing on a smaller core of functionality. I'd hate to reverse that trend and start bloating Struts again. IMO, the BSF actions are a perfect example of a core Struts feature (ie. Actions) allowing many neat implementations that don't have to be supported by the core project. David > > Other add-ons, could similarly be brought into the project, if their > communities wanted. > > Steve > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: April 26, 2004 7:57 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28609] - Scriptable Actions Support > > > > > > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG > > RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT > > <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28609>. > > ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND > > INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. > > > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28609 > > > > Scriptable Actions Support > > > > > > > > > > > > ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 2004-04-27 02:57 ------- > > Why should this move into the Struts project? Why isn't the > > SourceForge project > > a good home for this action? I admit that this seems pretty > > neat but Struts has > > a large dependency list as it is. It would be nice if Struts > > could avoid the > > language-flavor-of-the-week syndrome that other projects > > suffer from. A solid > > core framework with satellite add-on projects seems to be > > working well so far. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
