I believe that the simplest route would be to collapse everything into a single core JAR, which includes the workflow and other core APIs. This JAR would would use the JSR 330 annotations and a provide a couple of Module implementations. I would then have the Struts servlet filter wire everything up as needed using a JSR 330 compliant implementation.
-bp On Dec 8, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: > Since the XWork code is now owned by Apache (right?), you could split > it into two jars (workflow and DI). Then deprecate the DI artifact > unless someone here as aspirations to continue such support. Split in > two, this would hopefully also address Don's concern of the code base > being too big. > > Lastly, because Bob Lee is a Struts committer, you should get pretty > good support from him on. > > Paul > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Brian Pontarelli <br...@pontarelli.com> wrote: >> XWork is more than DI. If drives the workflow under the hoods of Struts. We >> would need all of that code in addition to the DI. The idea is to drop the >> DI part of XWork and replace it with Guice 2.1 (which should support JSR >> 330) and just pull in the rest of it. >> >> -bp >> >> >> On Dec 8, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: >> >>> Then what was the point of getting the IP for XWork? >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Brian Pontarelli <br...@pontarelli.com> >>> wrote: >>>> JSR 299 is EE while 330 is SE. >>>> >>>> -bp >>>> >>>> >>>> On Dec 8, 2009, at 4:12 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: >>>> >>>>> I've been loosely following the thread. It sounds like three DI >>>>> projects are being/will be supported: >>>>> * XWork >>>>> * Guice >>>>> * JSR-299/JSR-330 >>>>> >>>>> Why three? I can understand the last because it's EE, but the other >>>>> two are proprietary. >>>>> >>>>> Paul >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Lukasz Lenart >>>>> <lukasz.len...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>>>> In my opinion, current DI support is sufficient (it can be made more >>>>>> readable, but that's it ;-), I really don't get it what's the problem >>>>>> with >>>>>> double ObjectFactory issue??? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Lukasz >>>>>> http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
