On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Lukasz Lenart <lukasz.len...@googlemail.com> wrote: > 2011/1/31 Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org>: >> He he.. I'll give you the answer that I got whenever I wanted to do "beta" >> releases. Votes determine the quality of the release, not the version label. >> So 2.2.2 could be production if it's voted that way. When you put out your >> vote, ask: >> >> [ ] GA >> [ ] Beta >> [ ] Alpha >> >> If it's GA, it's production. Otherwise, beta can be published too. Alpha >> will just stay a developer build. > > It's quite uncommon, thanks Paul :-)
Actually, it's not. If you look around even just the ASF, you'll find that a number of the best-known ASF projects use this same scheme. In fact, we didn't invent it, we adopted it from those projects. -- Martin Cooper > > Kind regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > Kapituła Javarsovia http://javarsovia.pl > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
