Well, firstly I suggest using disroot instead of gmail. That is a good start.
One of the key problems I find today is that of separating bots from humans. If we fail to do so, bots can be innumerable speaking from a vast IPv6 space. All attempts to correct such attack will fail! Once we take a whitelisting approach, that of fixing IPv6 addresses and moving forward with decentralized servers with people hosting themselves, progress will be made. Thanking you Sagar Acharya https://humaaraartha.in 5 Jul 2023, 00:25 by nikita.nikita.kras...@gmail.com: >> I take a practical approach. I use simple programs when they do the job >> well, and more complex programs when >> they get the job done better. Sometimes a simple program >> can be useful for certain jobs, such as ones involving >> shell scripting, whereas a complex program may be more >> useful for example in other applications, such as using Solidworks for >> engineering work. LaTeX is certainly a bloated monstrosity, but the damn >> thing is useful for a lot of different tasks. >> >> People on this email list tend to go to an extreme in favoring simplicity >> above all else, which is why they release dumpster fires like the ST >> terminal emulator for example which has absolutely no features at all, is >> riddled with bugs and compatibility problems, and requires extensive >> patching to add in any useful features. The developers are also >> basement-dwelling losers, total raging assholes who take personal offense to >> the suggestion that their code should be better commented or that someone >> might fork the code to make an improved version. >> >> I tried ST for a time before realizing it was trash and just switched back >> to Xterm, the gold standard of functional X11 terminal emulators, which the >> ST developers talked shit about, calling "bloated" in their documentation, >> and saying the code wasn't good. Actually it is not bloated, the code >> quality is much higher than ST (and is actually commented!), It Just >> Works(TM), and it's noticeably faster as well when ST is patched with the >> juvenile "scrollback buffer support" implementation--which calls malloc() >> once for every line(!) of the scrollback buffer. >> >> Take anything that a religious cult member says with a grain of salt. >> >> Dave >> > > Oof, I feel like that's gonna start one hell of a flame war right now. > > About suckless's software. Personally, I've got an impression that it's not > about personal use. Like, you aren't really expected to install ST as you > main and everyday terminal. These programs are more of a collection of tools > that should be combined and embedded as a foundation for something bigger. > > Firefox will always be better than surf, it just will. But replacing Firefox > is not what surf should strive for. It's more of a tool for situations when > you need an ability to embed a website and full-blown Firefox or Chrome will > be an overkill. > > That said, if there are any compatibility problems _(which there probably > are, since why shouldn't there be any compatibility problems when your main > goal when writing software is to make it as small as possible)_ than that > kind of ruins the whole purpose of all of this... > > -- > Nikita >
