Wonderful thanks. I've merged that fix into 2.x as well.

   ...ant

On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Luciano Resende<luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:35 AM, ant elder<ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> While we're looking at all the validation messages and extensibility,
>> is there a way we can fix the
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.policy.security.tuscany_definitions.xml file in
>> the policy-security module to not include implementation.spring?
>> Including it there means it produces the two warnings below whenever
>> the spring modules aren't in classpath.
>>
>
> I made the intent a little more flexible by changing the constraints
> to just sca:implementation (1.x and 1.5.1 branches).
> This should solve the issue you reported.
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>

Reply via email to