On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:19 AM, ant elder <antel...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Simon Laws <simonsl...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:09 AM, ant elder<ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Its been nearly 6 weeks since the 2.0 M3 release so should we be
>>>> thinking about another release? We probably have enough content now -
>>>> the Assembly otests are nearly all passing, the're a new JSONP
>>>> binding, and the dynamic domain is starting to come together. So would
>>>> a M4 in a couple of weeks be doable? Or a bit longer to fit in more?
>>>>
>>>> ...ant
>>>>
>>>
>>> Excellent idea. I think we should update the CHANGES file and see how
>>> it looks. The SCAClient changes you mention on the other thread [1]
>>> sound useful to get in. Also I'd like to add the builder tidy and
>>> basic policy (not including external attachment) support to the list
>>> as these are in flight and have a chance of being done in the next
>>> couple of weeks.
>>>
>>> Simon
>>>
>>> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40tuscany.apache.org/msg09208.html
>>>
>>
>> This is taking longer due to the bringing up the JMS binding taking up
>> the time and I'm out on vacation for a while so it looks like early
>> October is now a more realistic date for the M4 release.
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>
> Apachecon is approaching quickly, and it would be good to have a
> release before the conference. I'd like to finish the porting of the
> Web 2.0 bindings and get better cloud support ready in the next couple
> weeks and then help on getting the release out.
>
Ok, how I take an M4 branch towards the end of next week, that gives a
bit of time for everyone to make a bit of progress on what they're
working on and still gives enough time to make sure M4 gets out before
the end of the month.
...ant
