i can fix it a bit, but what i am doing then is don't make it that performant as it is now I just make it a bit more threadsafe by doing a bit more stuff in the request itself.. Then everything is getting a bit easier.
But if we remove it, i don't do that extra work of course. johan On 10/1/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/1/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't think there's any harm in leaving it, the problem is that > > there are known thread-synchronization issues and there is noone > > willing to fix it :) > > Johan doesn't want to?! :-) > > I'm +0 for removing; we have a good alternative, but otoh, a patch > might come in the future. > > Eelco >
