ok didn't know that, then it can be removed.
On 10/22/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We already have such thing. It's called SimpleSynchronousPageStore and > it uses one file per page all in request thread. So it's not optimized > at all, but it can be good for development. > > -Matej > > On 10/22/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > remove the current implementation > > the thing martijn wants is easy to make for development mode. Then we do > > everything just in the request no fancy stuff just a dump > > But the current imlementation does to much, so we could introduce a > > DevPageFileStore that just dumps the pages as a file (maybe seperate per > > page if pages references pages but thats then all) > > > > johan > > > > > > On 10/21/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Did we come to a conclusion? > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-746 relies on this. > > > > > > Eelco > > > > > > On 10/2/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > i can fix it a bit, but what i am doing then is don't make it that > > > > performant as it is now > > > > I just make it a bit more threadsafe by doing a bit more stuff in > the > > > > request itself.. > > > > Then everything is getting a bit easier. > > > > > > > > But if we remove it, i don't do that extra work of course. > > > > > > > > johan > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/1/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On 10/1/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I don't think there's any harm in leaving it, the problem is > that > > > > > > there are known thread-synchronization issues and there is noone > > > > > > willing to fix it :) > > > > > > > > > > Johan doesn't want to?! :-) > > > > > > > > > > I'm +0 for removing; we have a good alternative, but otoh, a patch > > > > > might come in the future. > > > > > > > > > > Eelco > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
