On 15/12/2007, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A general remark about this list is that I also think this actually > should be 1.4.1. We agreed a long time ago that 1.4 would be only the > last missing parts of 2.0 (Java 5 related things, most notably > generics). Like I predicted back then, it is taking us a long time to > reach 1.3, and we should have the discipline of sticking to what we > promised way back: 1.4(.0) is about the last 2.0 ports, and after we > have a good 1.4.0 final, we can start on new features again.
Totally agree - I think I saw a comment on users@ from Johan or Igor to the effect that we hadn't had a discussion as to what 1.4 was, whereas my recollection is that we certainly stated what 1.4.0 was to be, i.e. as above. Personally, I'd be very against anything going into 1.4 that wasn't either a bug-fix found in 1.3.x or directly related to a 'missing' 2.0 feature. /Gwyn -- Download Wicket 1.3.0-rc2 now! - http://wicketframework.org
