On Dec 15, 2007 7:50 PM, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not ok with dropping binary compatibility for 1.4.1. Why call it > 1.4.1if it is in fact > 1.5 or 2.0? > I'd rather implement a milestone schedule for 1.4, like the Eclipse > project > does: > > 1.4-M1 – just generics/left overs from 2.0, bug fixes from 1.3 > 1.4-M2 – additional 1.5 features (mount annotations? varargs?), other > stuff, bug fixes from 1.3 > 1.4-M3 – other stuff, bug fixes from 1.3 > 1.4-RC1 – bug fixes... > 1.4-RC2 – bug fixes... > 1.4-RC3 – bug fixes... > 1.4 – final >
+1 I think that fits very well with how we have been doing things. Frank
