hm, the panel could need a some love though, there are quite a few rough edges, iirc. do you want it to be in included 1.3.1? i wouldn't like it being included in a half-baked state. then again, i'm all in when we put it into wicket-jmx in the 1.4 release train, when there's still enough room for changes.
-0.5 for integration in 1.3.1 +1 for integration in 1.4-SNAPSHOT Gerolf On Jan 12, 2008 9:12 PM, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > Frank > > > On Jan 12, 2008 9:04 PM, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > All, > > > > I think it would be beneficial to move Gerolf's jmx panel project into > > the wicket-jmx project. I think it would be a great asset to have in > > our core distribution and the fit with wicket-jmx seems natural. > > > > One could argue that the panel is stand alone and that the goal of > > wicket-jmx is to open wicket to jmx, and thus require separate > > projects. However I think they are related enough to go into just one > > package. IMO there is no need to keep them separate, as that will only > > increase our packaging burden. > > > > WDYT? > > > > Martijn > > > > -- > > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst > > Apache Wicket 1.3.0 is released > > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0 > > >
