+1 for whenever gerolf is ready -igor
On Jan 12, 2008 12:23 PM, Gerolf Seitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hm, the panel could need a some love though, there are quite a few rough > edges, iirc. > do you want it to be in included 1.3.1? i wouldn't like it being included in > a half-baked state. > then again, i'm all in when we put it into wicket-jmx in the 1.4 release > train, when there's > still enough room for changes. > > -0.5 for integration in 1.3.1 > +1 for integration in 1.4-SNAPSHOT > > Gerolf > > > On Jan 12, 2008 9:12 PM, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Frank > > > > > > On Jan 12, 2008 9:04 PM, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > All, > > > > > > I think it would be beneficial to move Gerolf's jmx panel project into > > > the wicket-jmx project. I think it would be a great asset to have in > > > our core distribution and the fit with wicket-jmx seems natural. > > > > > > One could argue that the panel is stand alone and that the goal of > > > wicket-jmx is to open wicket to jmx, and thus require separate > > > projects. However I think they are related enough to go into just one > > > package. IMO there is no need to keep them separate, as that will only > > > increase our packaging burden. > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > > -- > > > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst > > > Apache Wicket 1.3.0 is released > > > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0 > > > > > >
