also note that for some clones "trunk" is still the default branch. be sure to 'git checkout master' which is where 6.0 stuff lives.
-igor On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> not sure if git://git.apache.org/wicket.git is kept up with commits to >> git-wip-us.... > > This is what one of the INFRA members said but later we realized that > these mirrors doesn't work at the moment against WIP repo. > Users can use http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket.git > Note, that it is HTTP, without S. > >> >> i think for users >> >> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>> The most important info is missing - the checkout url! :-) >>> >>> For devs: >>> https://your_apache_usern...@git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket.git >>> >>> For users: >>> git://git.apache.org/wicket.git >>> or >>> https://github.com/apache/wicket >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Jeremy Thomerson >>> <jer...@wickettraining.com> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Clint Checketts >>>> <checke...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Jeremy, >>>>> >>>>> Will Git development mimic the current subversion workflow, or will we see >>>>> we see a more Git-ish way like 'git flow'? See- >>>>> http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/ >>>> >>>> >>>> I think at least the core developers are already trying to adopt a more >>>> git-like work flow. Look at some of the ajax/JS stuff that happened on GH >>>> prior to being merged into SVN. I'm definitely in favor of a more >>>> "Git-ish" way of doing things. >>>> >>>> >>>>> I realize that likely the answer is 'we don't know yet', so I'd like to >>>>> get >>>>> the conversation going. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I'd suggest: give us through the weekend for the committers to get git >>>> (hehe pun) setup and in use, then let's start a separate discussion. I >>>> also say this because of a very large thread on infrastructure-dev right >>>> now [1] about the current git hook that requires all committers to have an >>>> @ >>>> apache.org email address, which means for me to pull from your GH repo, for >>>> instance, I'd need to rewrite the history some. I think that this >>>> requirement will go away (the message I linked to is the first with real >>>> weight that says it can go away), but whatever the outcome of that thread >>>> is will have a major impact on our git-flow. Involvement with that ongoing >>>> thread among other conversations has kept from from actually playing with >>>> our git repo. I hope the distraction will be gone soon. >>>> >>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/jsnmxdzf5qkkrvwg >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Jeremy Thomerson >>>> http://wickettraining.com >>>> *Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org* >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Martin Grigorov >>> jWeekend >>> Training, Consulting, Development >>> http://jWeekend.com > > > > -- > Martin Grigorov > jWeekend > Training, Consulting, Development > http://jWeekend.com
