> I've never seen a crash in smsbox because of this. SMSbox is > unchanged as far as DLR's are concerned. If you got an assert, in > your case, thats normal because your EMI reply is not what bearerbox > would expect. Of course this should be fixed and is relatively easy > to fix. But it also means that in your case DLR's will not work > because no timestamp imformation is given back from the SMSC.
Could you provide the fix for emi2 here? We would like to have again a working CVS tree for development. BTW, please instruct me on how I can help you in figuring out if the timestamp's are supported using our SMSC and I'll provide for information on this. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- wapme.net - wherever you are
