On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 07:07 PM, Alex Judd wrote:
Yep agreed.
We can either force all carriage returns to use the CRLF standard on
parsing
of the page (recommended route) or have a system/carriage return
character
switch on the command line.
I would go for standard confirming
There's a few other minor modifications I'd like to make to test_ppg
etc. so
I'd be happy to implement the changes necessary.
BTW does the content look right?
Yes, all mandatory headers were there.
Aarno
Alex
----- Original Message -----
From: "Aarno Syvänen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alex Judd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: MMS m-notification-ind and test_ppg
This indeed causes problems, though CRLF line break is one defined by
MIME standard. Perhaps command line option for line break would be
usefull - i mean one translating input break to standard ones.
Aarno
On Friday, November 29, 2002, at 05:13 PM, Alex Judd wrote:
I was using binary as wappush returns a syntax error if I wasn't
encoding
the data. test_ppg seems to use windows (oa,od) carriage returns for
it's
joined lines, whereas my system is using xnix(oa) carriage returns.
Don't
know if this would cause the problem
I enclosed the dumps below.
2002-11-29 17:11:42 [1] DEBUG: data: 3c 62 61 64 6d 65 73 73
<badmess
2002-11-29 17:11:42 [1] DEBUG: data: 61 67 65 2d 72 65 73 70
age-resp
2002-11-29 17:11:42 [1] DEBUG: data: 6f 6e 73 65 20 63 6f 64 onse
cod
2002-11-29 17:11:42 [1] DEBUG: data: 65 3d 22 32 30 30 30 22
e="2000"
2002-11-29 17:11:42 [1] DEBUG: data: 20 64 65 73 63 3d 22 4e
desc="N
2002-11-29 17:11:42 [1] DEBUG: data: 6f 74 20 75 6e 64 65 72 ot
under
2002-11-29 17:11:42 [1] DEBUG: data: 73 74 6f 6f 64 20 64 75
stood
du
2002-11-29 17:11:42 [1] DEBUG: data: 65 20 74 6f 20 6d 61 6c e to
mal
2002-11-29 17:11:42 [1] DEBUG: data: 66 6f 72 6d 65 64 20 73
formed s
2002-11-29 17:11:42 [1] DEBUG: data: 79 6e 74 61 78 22 3e 3c
yntax"><
2002-11-29 17:11:42 [1] DEBUG: data: 2f 62 61 64 6d 65 73 73
/badmess
2002-11-29 17:11:42 [1] DEBUG: data: 61 67 65 2d 72 65 73 70
age-resp
2002-11-29 17:11:42 [1] DEBUG: data: 6f 6e 73 65 3e 3c 2f 70
onse></p
2002-11-29 17:11:42 [1] DEBUG: data: 61 70 3e ap>
From debugging the message the total wappush is
POST /wappush?username=xxxx&password=yyyy HTTP/1.1
(0a,0d)Host: localhost:8080
(0a,0d)Content-Type:multipart/related; boundary=asdlfkjiurwghasf;
type="application/xml"
(0a,0d)X-WAP-Application-Id: mms.ua
(0a,0d)Content-Length: 779
(0a,0d)
(0a,0d)
(0a,0d)--asdlfkjiurwghasf
(0a,0d)Content-Type: application/xml
(0a,0d)<?xml version="1.0"?>
(0a)<!DOCTYPEpap PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD PAP//EN"
"http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/pap_1.0.dtd";>
(0a)<pap>
(0a) <push-message push-id="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
progress-notes-requested="false">
(0a) <address
address-value="[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
(0a) </address>
(0a) </push-message>
(0a)</pap>
(0a,0d)
(0a)--asdlfkjiurwghasf
(0a,0d)Content-Type: application/vnd.wap.mms-message
(0a,0d)Content-Type:application/vnd.wap.mms-message
(0a)X-Mms-Message-Type:m-notification-ind
(0a)X-Mms-Transaction-Id:125
(0a)X-Mms-Version:1.0
(0a)X-Mms-Message-Class:Personal
(0a)X-Mms-Message-Size:4910
(0a)X-Mms-Expiry:256;type=relative
(0a)X-Mms-Content-Location:http://212.118.244.25/mmstest/m4.mms
(0a)X-WAP-Application-Id:x-wap-application:mms.ua\
(0a,0d)
(0a)--asdlfkjiurwghasf--
