Am 25.08.22 um 13:19 schrieb Iñaki Ucar:
I assume their maintainers didn't do it on purpose, maybe it was
easier for a certain update, didn't have time to look into it and
weren't aware of the guideline. But this is very frustrating. Seeing
many hours of work just wiped out without any notice or explanation is
very frustrating.
In my case (freefem++), it was actually was a mixture of all.
To cut a long story short: This flexblas stuff doesn't "harmonize well"
with freefem++, rsp. more bluntly speaking, flexblas breaks freefem++.
Because of this, when going after freefem++'s regressions, years after
the flexiblas changes had been introduced, I inadvertedly and
accidentally reverted the flexblas related changes, because these
apparently do not work out with freefem++.
Ralf
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
