On Mon Mar 4, 2024 at 22:35 +0100, Sandro wrote:
> On 04-03-2024 07:59, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > It would welcome if anyone can help Robert here: 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235055
>
> I had a look and it seems the package is currently stuck on broken 
> python-pymaven-patch, which requires python-lxml < 5~~. In rawhide and 
> f40 python-lxml was updated to 5.1.0 two months ago.
>
> For about as long there has been a PR open for python-pymaven-patch 
> removing that version constraint. Notably, the maintainer of 
> python-pymaven-patch is the same person, who submitted the 
> scancode-toolkit review request.
>
> There may be more trouble down the road. But for the moment, I don't see 
> how others can help driving this forward. A proven packager could merge 
> the PR. But I don't know how eclipseo, who's a proven packager, would 
> feel about that.

Fixing FTI bugs that are unaddressed by a package's maintainer
definitely falls under the purview of a provenpackager.
I rebased the PR [1] and will merge it once CI passes.

[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pymaven-patch/pull-request/1
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to