On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 3:28 PM Iñaki Ucar <iu...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > So someone wanted to use rpmautospec and was willing to do the work, putting > things together as an opt-in feature. Perfect. > > Now, I don't see any problem if some time later someone revisits the topic > and proposes to go further. I don't see anything unfriendly here. Everything > was set or decided at some point, and nothing could ever be changed if we > don't allow ourselves to change our minds and be free to make new proposals. > > That said, we are also free to reject those proposals, and I'm -1 here. As of > today, I think it's fine as an opt-in feature, and I'm even using it for some > small uncomplicated packages. But I don't think it should be the default with > an opt-out.
It is already supposed to be default / preferred since this Fedora 38 Change: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rpmautospec_by_Default Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
