Hi Martin, Op vr 26 jul. 2019 om 00:02 schreef Martin Kampas <martin.kam...@jolla.com>:
> Hi Eli, > > > > does the Android SDK version match the Android OS version? > > does the macOS SDK version match the macOS version? > > does the Windows SDK version match the Windows OS version? > > does the Qt Creator version match the Qt version? > > ... > > > The universal answer is No, simply because the SDK and the platform are > two different products with their own life cycles. > > > > Each Sailfish SDK version supports multiple Sailfish OS versions. > Currently this means the latest OS version published to all users + some > older OS versions. Soon, we will start releasing also build targets for the > latest OS version published to EA users. > As far as I recall most every SFOS release came with a SDK release, of course I may be wrong. Either way if versioning "should not" be tied to SFOS versions then why in the world not use a date versioning scheme like you did from 2014 until 2018? > > > You can be sure the links published on > https://sailfishos.org/wiki/Application_SDK#Latest_SDK_Release always > point to the latest SDK release, so unless you dig them out yourself, you > cannot download older installers by mistake. > Nobody makes no mistakes big or small company, when I went to latest and it gave me an apparently meaningless version number that matches an OS version number from over a year ago that made me do a double take and look at modify dates here http://releases.sailfishos.org/sdk/installers/ > > > Enjoy using the latest greatest SDK and forget about version numbers, they > become important only when dealing with issues :) > I am enjoying and hope you will take the suggestion to revert to date versioning or SFOS version matching seriously. Best regards, Eli > > > BR, > > Martin >
_______________________________________________ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org
