Harold L Hunt II wrote (in a message from Friday 19) > Matthieu, > > The new file, prngc.c, uses sockaddr_storage. However, I know that at > least Cygwin does not have sockaddr_storage. > > No alternative is provided and no conditional compilation is in effect > to fall back to previous functionality when sockaddr_storage is not > available. This breaks the build on Cygwin. > > What can be done to fix the build on platforms that do not have > sockaddr_storage? > > I already tried using sockaddr instead, but that is missing fields that > are contained in sockaddr_storage. Any other ideas?
Does cygwin have AF_UNIX sockets and the sys/un.h header ? If so it's quite easy to adapt the code not to use sockaddr_storage. Otherwise, I'll provide a way to #ifdef out the prngd code, but then if /dev/[u]random fails, xdm will have to abort (or run with predictibles cookies). Matthieu _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel