Hi, On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Olivier Goffart <[email protected]> wrote: > So that class really fits into Qt. But only as a low level class > (that could even stay internal maybe, I still fail to see a use case for it > that is not covered by the convinience i suggest)
(without ever having actually read the standard to date, despite using it quite a lot...) Writing classes implementing DNS-SD would probably be a lot easier with this, for example. There are undoubtedly others. It is low level, sure. That doesn't mean it isn't useful for people doing relatively low-level things. I'm not against 'prettier' API built on top of this as convenience building blocks, but I would quite like the base to be there if I need it, too, without having to reinvent the wheel. BR, Robin _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
