On Wednesday 26 October 2011 20:03:56 Robin Burchell wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Olivier Goffart <[email protected]> wrote: > > So that class really fits into Qt. But only as a low level class > > (that could even stay internal maybe, I still fail to see a use case for > > it that is not covered by the convinience i suggest) > > (without ever having actually read the standard to date, despite using > it quite a lot...) Writing classes implementing DNS-SD would probably > be a lot easier with this, for example. There are undoubtedly others. > > It is low level, sure. That doesn't mean it isn't useful for people > doing relatively low-level things.
Don't get me wrong ;-) I fully agree with that. > I'm not against 'prettier' API > built on top of this as convenience building blocks, but I would quite > like the base to be there if I need it, too, without having to > reinvent the wheel. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
