On Monday, 19 de December de 2011 09.40.44, David Faure wrote: > > What should this do for something like 4.8.0c? Better to not confuse > > things > > and to leave the version number as it was. In practice, I'd be surprised > > if > > there was much confusion caused by Digia supplying a customised 4.8.0 > > which > > includes just fixes. If people are using Digia's 4.8.0 version, I suspect > > they are also likely to report bugs they find to Digia instead of to the > > general Qt bug tracker anyway. > > I disagree. > They will post questions to forums, to consultants, on blog posts, etc. etc.
Anyone may produce a "vendor branch" and release it, so long as they clearly
mark it as a patched version of the official Qt.
"Qt Commercial 4.8.0" sounds to me like it's clearly marked.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
