On 12/16/11 8:37 PM, "ext David Faure" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Thursday 15 December 2011 11:21:41 Turunen Tuukka wrote: >> So now there is total of 108 improvements and bug fixes available in Qt >> Commercial 4.8.0 that are not part of the LGPL release. > >While I understand the reasons, I want to state that this is going to >make >support a mess. > >Both versions are called 4.8.0, but do not contain the same code. > >So when someone says "With Qt-4.8.0 I have the following issue", it will >never >be clear which 4.8.0 this is about, we'll have to educate everyone to say >in >addition if this is 4.8.0-LGPL or 4.8.0-Commercial. Couldn't the version >number be different, when the code is different, instead? E.g. 4.8.0c. >That >doesn't fit into the numerical QT_VERSION, but at least qmake -query and >every >other location which shows a qt version number (packages, qt creator, >etc.) >would show clearly 4.8.0c instead of 4.8.0. To some extent Linux distributions have always done that as well, and I still remember something called qt-copy in KDEŠ ;-) Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
