Couple of comments:
1) Some time back one of the devinfo folks supplied a link to an article detailing an sys-admins view of the 2.4 linux kernel. He put forward a really good argument against switching. I'm not proposing abandoning the idea of a newer kernel, just pointing out some "food for thought." 2) In response to Stephens comment about adding X to SME: Wouldn't adding X-server functionality to SME point us down a different path than what SME was designed to do? Seems to me that if a sys admin saw a need to setup an X-server to service "thin clients," then you'd want a machine dedicated to this task that sat behind your SME firewall. Am I off base here?? Regards, -- Greg J. Zartman, P.E. Vice-President Logging Engineering International, Inc. 1243 West 7th Avenue Eugene, Oregon 97402 541-683-8383 fax 541-683-8144 -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
