Charlie Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> So you are suggesting a project fork. That's a lot of work, and fragments > the community. So you should have very good justification for proposing > is. Well it is only a project fork if Mitel does not join in and follow along with the community ;-> Comments have been mentioned that 2.4 kernel has limitations. So what. Isn't that what a development project is all about? I am not talking about a production release here. I'm talking a bleeding edge development release. We move forward, we find what works, what doesn't work, but the goal is to develop the next SME release. > Would it not be better to develop a HOWTO for a 2.4 kernel upgrade (not > difficult) and for an ext3 file system conversion (more difficult, but > quite doable)? If Mitel wants this to be developed on a particular platform, in a particular way, how about taking a leadership role and: - publish a development roadmap - issue a HOWTO for a 2.4 kernel upgrade - issue a HOWTO for ext3 file system conversion If Mitel does their part, I know the devinfo community will at least start to accomplish the rest. This way we do not create a project fork, we simply create a development project and we all continue to work towards the goal of making SME better. Regards, -- Darrell May DMC Netsourced.com http://netsourced.com http://myEZserver.com -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
