On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, little bark, BIG BYTE!! wrote:
> >>>sufficient hours to it. Why should Mitel's owners fund this > >>>development [at this time], if they don't see it as a pressing > >>>business need? > > Because it is the direction the project *needs* to go in. In *your* opinion. Obviously Mitel's management doesn't agree that this is the highest priority right now, or they would be paying me to do it, instead of the other developments which are on my TODO list. I'd be *very* happy for someone to work out a kernel 2.4.x and ext3 upgrade strategy. I'd be interested in doing it myself, but I don't have the time to do it right now, and I don't have an urgent need for it either. > It would seem that there is agreement there also. Even if there were agreement (which there isn't) we are still left with question of who should do it. We all have all of the ingredients, so any of us could do it. Is there any good reason that we should ask, say, Darrell to do it, rather than ask you? -- Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lead Product Developer Network Server Solutions Group http://www.e-smith.com/ Mitel Networks Corporation http://www.mitel.com/ Phone: +1 (613) 368 4376 or 564 8000 Fax: +1 (613) 564 7739 -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
